home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT0593>
- <title>
- May 09, 1994: The Senate:The Retirement Crisis
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- May 09, 1994 Nelson Mandela
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- THE SENATE, Page 51
- The Retirement Crisis
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> With so many Democrats leaving at once, Clinton stands a chance
- of losing an effective majority
- </p>
- <p>By Julie Johnson/Washington
- </p>
- <p> The night before David Boren officially declared last week
- that he will leave the Senate to preside over the University
- of Oklahoma, he got a congratulatory call from President Clinton.
- The President was "really happy" for Boren, he said. But Clinton's
- feelings were probably much more complicated than that. While
- the President will be sending off an often rebellious Democratic
- colleague who opposed him on last year's budget bill, Boren
- could be replaced by an even more consistent foe: a Republican.
- Coming just eight weeks after Senate majority leader George
- Mitchell announced that he will not seek another term, Boren's
- decision is the latest in a string of congressional retirements
- that are likely to spell trouble for Clinton in the midterm
- congressional elections in November. Boren is the sixth Democratic
- Senator to retire voluntarily this year.
- </p>
- <p> Hours before Clinton called Boren, five of the President's senior
- political advisers--armed with charts, maps and polling data--trundled into the Oval Office to illustrate the extent of
- the danger. With 22 Democratic Senate seats now up for election,
- compared with 13 in the G.O.P., the Democrats' 56-to-44 majority
- is in grave danger. With the sudden loss of proven vote getters
- such as Mitchell and Boren, the Democratic sure-bet states of
- Maine and Oklahoma are thrown into the toss-up column. As a
- result, political strategists can envision an outcome that could
- leave Democrats with nominal but not effective control of the
- Senate.
- </p>
- <p> In the House, where Democrats hold a 256-to-176 edge over the
- G.O.P., the outlook is better for the Administration, but not
- by much. History is not on the side of the Democrats. Only once
- in this century, when F.D.R. was in the White House, has a Democratic
- President managed to pick up seats in the House during a midterm
- election.
- </p>
- <p> To minimize the losses, Clinton plans to hit the fund-raising
- trail, where an appearance by the President can generate $1
- million or more in local campaign donations. Clinton will be
- especially active in states where Republicans have recruited
- strong senatorial candidates. Among them: Pennsylvania, New
- Jersey and Tennessee. The First Lady will conduct her own tour,
- as will Al Gore, who is already stumping for Democrats once
- a week.
- </p>
- <p> Even with a Democratic-controlled Congress, Clinton learned
- in the first 100 days that it takes only 41 unified Senate Republicans
- to slam the brakes on popular legislation. And they can usually
- count on a few renegade Southern Democrats to join them. The
- G.O.P. sank Clinton's $16.3 billion economic-stimulus plan last
- year, routinely stalled or blocked high-profile nominees and
- delayed passage of bills like the Family and Medical Leave Act,
- the Brady handgun-control bill and a measure to ease voter registration.
- </p>
- <p> Wielding the power of filibuster, Senate Republicans have on
- 47 occasions since 1992 forced Senate majority leader Mitchell
- to round up a daunting 60 votes, necessarily including a number
- of opposition Republicans, to shut off debate. At stake now
- is Clinton's legislative agenda for the second half of his presidency.
- What the White House realizes, and hopes to avoid, is that such
- a stalemate could sour Clinton's own re-election prospects in
- 1996.
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-